All about DOCSIS technology,CMTS Headends, Cable Television, Information technology, High Definition TV, IPTV, Fiber to the home. Cable Modem Drivers and Troubleshooting.
Showing posts with label OpenCable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OpenCable. Show all posts

Bright Forecast for 2008: Cable and Telcos to Continue Battling

Posted by Carl Weinschenk

The competition between cable and telephone companies continues to accelerate, and business and residential users continue to be the big winners. While this is not a new trend, it is comforting to see that it is in full force in the new year.

Verizon said this week that it has more than doubled the speed of its digital subscriber line (DSL) service to 7 Mbps at 400 locations in the United States, and that the increased throughput will be available nationwide by the end of the year. The goal, this Philly.com story says, is to increase interest in DSL to combat cable gains.

Verizon DSL sales had fallen off a cliff, dropping from 301,000 in the third quarter of 2006 to just 56,000 during the third quarter of this year. Part of that drop can be attributed to the transition of many customers to the company’s faster FiOS fiber service, of course. The company apparently figures that there is enough of a market at the lower end of the speed spectrum to have two distinctly different broadband product families.

Perhaps the most striking example of how the deck chairs have been rearranged during the past decade is the fact that Comcast now says that it is the fourth largest telephone service provider in the United States. Wired describes the CES keynote delivered on Tuesday by CEO Brian Roberts. The next iteration of the industry’s Cable over Data Service Interface Specifications, DOCSIS 3.0, will be available in some markets by year’s end. The story details innovations planned by the company, including ultra fast movie downloads and Tru2Way, an open access cable converter. The company will embed the circuitry into many devices, the story says. Necessity — in the form of innovation — apparently truly is the mother of invention.

This is an interesting look at how the telcos are gearing up for competition from an analyst with PDS Consulting. The writer says that Verizon is importing executives that have “marketing-oriented, hyper-competitive” attitudes from the its wireless arm. Likewise, AT&T’s merger with BellSouth has given the company more control over the wireless company, formerly called Cingular, that had been owned by the two before the merger. The post ends with examples of aggressive bundling initiatives from each company.

Not surprisingly, analysts find that the competition is leading to increased spending and more expansive services. This In-Stat press release hypes a study that says 90 percent of cable systems now offer high-definition television. This, the commentary says, likely was driven by the “stiff competition” offered by telco and satellite video services. The firm found that 84 percent of systems offer 750 MHz or more of bandwidth, OpenCable Application Platform (OCAP)-based set top boxes are beginning to be deployed and that 42 percent of cable television subscribers also subscribe to broadband services.

The reason for the desire to engage its customer base is is clear: The survey found that 54 percent of the cable systems said that the telephone company was offering service somewhere in their footprints. The release didn’t describe the average size of the telco offerings within their service area. Regardless, the fact that there are telco competitors in more than half of the operators’ areas is extraordinary.

The scrutiny that the competition causes is clear in this Telecosm post. Ike Elliott says that Verizon and AT&T won the battle in 2007. The two telcos’ stock price rose more than 15 percent, while Comcast’s was down 35 percent — perhaps the driver of Roberts’ service announcements at CES — and Charter performed at an even lower rate. The reasons are simple: Cable is losing video customers and its broadband progress is middling. Its success in voice, the writer says, is not enough to offset these twin sources of bad news.

itbusinessedge.com

Also Read These Articles
Wall St. connects with telcos and cable

Of course, telecom and cable stocks have been solid performers this year for other reasons. Investors appear to be recognizing that the wireless units of traditional phone companies are doing well. And many cable firms have been reporting healthy gains in subscribers for their Internet phone and digital cable offerings.

Copper vs. cable

bellscable0720.mkw.gif
Shares of Baby Bells Verizon and AT&T have outperformed the stocks of the top two cable companies so far this year.
Earnings showdown
The top telcos and cable companies will report 2Q results in the next two weeks
Co. (report date) Est. EPS Est. Sales
AT&T (7/24) $0.67 $29.6B
Comcast (7/26) $0.19 $7.7B
Verizon (7/30) $0.58 $23.0B
Time Warner Cable (8/1) $0.27 $4.0B
Source:Thomson Financial

Shares of Dow components AT&T (Charts, Fortune 500) and Verizon (Charts, Fortune 500) are up 11 percent and 13.5 percent this year while shares of the top two cable firms, Comcast (Charts) and Time Warner Cable (Charts), which is a majority owned subsidiary of CNNMoney.com's parent company Time Warner (Charts, Fortune 500), have gained just 3 percent and 1 percent respectively. Time Warner Cable began trading as a separate stock on a so-called "when issued" basis in January and made its formal debut in early March.

With all four companies set to report their latest financial results in the next two weeks, will the telecoms continue to outperform cablers?

AT&T, Comcast and Time Warner Cable are all expected to post robust gains in profits and earnings for the second quarter but a lot of this growth is driven by acquisitions.

Ma Bell, which will report its second quarter results on July 24, completed its purchase of BellSouth in December. Comcast and Time Warner Cable teamed up in a deal to split up the assets of bankrupt cable provider Adelphia Communications earlier this year. Comcast's earnings are due out on July 26 while Time Warner Cable will report its results on August 1.

Verizon, however, is expected to report an earnings decline of 3 percent and revenue increase of just 1.3 percent for the second quarter. It will release its results on July 30.

The stock did get a lift recently due to speculation that British telecom Vodafone, which is a minority owner in Verizon Wireless, was considering a takeover of Verizon. Vodafone has denied the rumors.

Despite the sluggish growth projection for Verizon, Cowen & Co. analyst Thomas Watts is predicting solid results in this quarter and the next few quarters for Verizon on other metrics.

In a recent research note, he thinks the company is doing a good job of getting customers to sign up for newer services, most notably its FiOS video product that competes most directly with cable.

"[Verizon is] focused on transforming its revenue to include a greater proportion of higher growth services, such as wireless, broadband, and video, and a decreasing percentage from traditional telephony," Watts wrote in his report.

Watts also wrote that AT&T should benefit in the second quarter from healthy increases in digital subscriber line (DSL) Internet access customers as well as strong demand for AT&T's wireless services.

Although sales of Apple's (Charts, Fortune 500) iPhone, which AT&T is the exclusive carrier for in the U.S., won't have a huge impact on second quarter sales since the phone was released just days before the quarter ended, Watts wrote that AT&T may have added as many as 200,000 new subscribers in the quarter due to the iPhone and that this bodes well for the rest of the year.

money.cnn.com

Cable still doesn't like DCR+. Brenner Defends OpenCable

And the industry got a chance to elaborate on that position in yesterday's CableNEXT lunch keynote by David Brenner, National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) senior vice president of law and regulatory policy.

Predictably, Brenner said the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) should reject DCR+ (Digital Cable Ready-Plus), a proposal of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) , in favor of what he called a more universal option: OpenCable.

This is all about a two-way plug-and-play agreement that would allow TVs to authorize and display digital cable services, including video-on-demand and interactive program guides, without a set-top box. The FCC adopted a one-way plug-and-play agreement in 2002, leading to TVs that use an operator-supplied CableCARD to authorize services. Now the FCC wants to have a two-way accord settled well before the February 2009 digital TV transition.

But cable and the CEA have been unable to reach a consensus and continue to espouse OpenCable and DCR+, respectively. (See Two-Way Battle Reaches FCC.)

Of course, cable thinks the FCC should keep its nose out of it -- partly because the industry claims OpenCable is already the market's choice.

Brenner noted that TV makers such as Panasonic and LG Electronics Inc. (London: LGLD - message board; Korea: 6657.KS) have already agreed to incorporate the OpenCable Platform, as has Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC - message board). (See Intel Goes Inside Cable... Again.)

More recently, TiVo Inc. (Nasdaq: TIVO - message board) disclosed in an FCC filing that the cable industry had agreed to make "clarifications or adjustments" to OpenCable for a two-way DVR/set-top combo. (See TiVo à la Mode .)

"The FCC, however, seems to be reluctant to rely on the market at this point," Brenner said.
Even if the FCC selects DCR+, it's "unrealistic" to think that such devices would be manufactured and ready for use by the 2009 cutover, he added.

Cable operators say DCR+ would be expensive to implement. They also claim DCR+'s limited capabilities would force consumers to buy a separate set-top box to access services like TV-based caller ID or "Start Over," the Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC - message board)application that restarts shows already in progress.

In sum, DCR+ "would kill innovation in the cable industry and micromanage technology choices," Brenner said.

The CEA believes DCR+ would give set-top and TV makers everything necessary to deliver interactive services that are not covered by the existing one-way agreement. The agency is also not wild about seeing the adoption of a platform that is under the general control of the cable industry.

Separately, the cable industry is pushing the FCC to consider a platform that could be shared by the entire universe of Multi-channel Video Programming Distributors (MVPDs). This "All-MVPD" system would encompass not only cable operators and the telcos, but also satellite television providers, which so far have been exempt from the regulatory proceedings.

To support and authorize cable services, the All-MVPD approach would require a small device that would hook into the back of the television. Something smaller than a cable box, but a little larger than a CableCARD.

As envisioned, the service operator would supply the small security element, and the bulk of components associated with All-MVPD would be housed in the TV set.

Jeff Baumgartner, Site Editor, Cable Digital News

CEOs Push OpenCable

In separate meetings last month, the top executives of the countrys two largest cable companies urged Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin to reject a proposal from consumer-electronics manufacturers for letting TVs access interactive cable services and to instead adopt the cable industrys own plan.

Comcast CEO Brian Roberts, in a solid day of meetings Oct. 26, delivered presentations to Martin and the FCCs four other commissioners to lobby for the OpenCable Platform, a middleware technology developed by CableLabs for standardizing the way two-way applications communicate with cable headends.

Roberts and his staff stressed that Americas cable industry is committed to OpenCable and that the technology has the support of leading consumer-electronics companies, according to a Comcast ex parte filing last Monday.

DUELING PROPOSALSThe rare face-to-face between Roberts and Martin came after Time Warner Cable CEO Glenn Britt met with Martin and FCC commissioners Jonathan Adelstein and Michael Copps on Oct. 24, also to promote OpenCable over the consumer-electronics industrys competing proposal.

Cable-industry lobbyists said the FCC may issue a decision on the two-way cable proposals as early as this month.

With the CEO campaign, cable hopes to convince the FCC that OpenCable is the only viable technology for providing third-party electronic devices access to cables interactive services, such as video-on-demand and interactive program guides, before the government-mandated digital TV transition in February 2009.

The Consumer Electronics Association has pushed a proposal referred to as DCR Plus (digital cable ready plus) that would specify protocols for VOD and other individual applications.

According to operators, if the FCC required the cable industry to support DCR Plus, it would cost several hundred million dollars and stifle development of two-way services not specified by DCR Plus, such as caller ID on the TV. According to comments filed with the FCC by the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, developing DCR Plus would take years of standards body and intellectual property turmoil.

But the CEA, for its part, has asserted in FCC filings that competitive DCR Plus products would include other innovations above and beyond those supported or allowed via OpenCable, such as Internet-downloaded video content.

Roberts and the Comcast team which included senior vice president of strategic planning Mark Coblitz and chief policy adviser for FCC and regulatory policy James Coltharp noted that with the DCR Plus proposal, CEA is asking the FCC to micromanage technology choices for cable in a way it has never done for any industry.

The CEA, in FCC filings, has argued that consumer-electronics manufacturers have been reluctant to bank on promises of [OpenCable] support that, five years later, still have not come to fruition. The association also claims that creating the elements of DCR Plus should be straightforward and implementable.

The NCTA has responded that a DCR Plus device would be obsolete even before it rolls off the assembly line and would likely fail in the marketplace, because it would be unable to access newer features like caller ID on the TV and interactive games.

Ultimately, cable operators back an all-MVPD approach, which would provide a way for CE devices to access interactive services from any multichannel video programming distributor (i.e., cable, satellite or telco).

OPENCABLE DEPLOYEDIn the meantime, major cable operators, including Comcast, Cox Communications, Time Warner Cable, Cablevision Systems and Bright House Networks, have pledged to have OpenCable widely supported by the end of 2008. Time Warner Cable claims to have already deployed 150,000 OpenCable-based set-top boxes in 13 divisions.

Consumer electronics companies that are developing or have delivered OpenCable-compatible products include LG Electronics, Panasonic, Samsung Electronics, Toshiba and Intel.


(Multichannel News Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge)